Updated: Apr 11
Welcome back to my blog!
It’s been way too long since I last wrote a review on here, but it’s been a wild year and of course, the cinemas have been closed for months on end. I definitely think that the long absence of cinemas has only made me more grateful for them re-opening. If lockdown has shown us anything, it’s that people will go to great lengths to replicate cinematic experiences in their own homes. I am convinced, now more than ever, that cinema has a bright future and that online streaming is not going to be the death of it.
So I went to the Vue on Friday to watch Tenet, which after being delayed three times due to COVID-19, is now hoped to bring audiences flooding back into theatres across the UK.
Tenet is a story about a secret CIA agent on an international mission that transcends time as we know it, in an attempt to prevent a catastrophic World War 3 scenario.
From a technical perspective, Tenet is marvellous. The scale of the stunts and spectacle that Christopher Nolan creates on screen, without the use of special effects is impressive to say the least. Nolan really bought a Boeing 747 plane, just to crash it into a building and blow it all up. Perhaps more impressive than this large scale spectacle though, is the detailed presentation of the mind-boggling concept of ‘time inversion’. During many scenes in Tenet, more than one perception of time plays out on screen simultaneously, which I loved watching unfold in front of me. Tenet is a celebration of cinema. The score, which is composed by Ludwig Goransson (breaking way from Nolan’s usual partnership with Hans Zimmer), is pumped full of adrenaline and perfectly accents the drama happening on screen. I also found that some musical sequences sounded almost like they were in reverse, which suited the narrative.
The acting was also commendable in this film. John David Washington and Robert Pattinson had a good chemistry and Pattinson was particularly charming in this role. Kenneth Branagh was an adequately ominous, Russian antagonist. However, the majority of characters in Tenet are kept emotionally distant and feel more like chess pieces than fully developed, 3 dimensional characters. Clearly, it was intentional of Nolan to keep the characters at an arms length from the audience, as the protagonist doesn’t even have a name, and his personal desires and needs are not really explored beyond the mission he accepts. I’m not really sure what the reasoning behind this decision was, and in my opinion, its one of the film’s biggest flaws. While the car chases, fight scenes and action sequences were all technically entertaining, they lacked tension, because the audience are given no time or reason to invest in the characters within these scenes. That being said, Elizabeth Debicki as Kat is by far, the heart and soul of this movie. To me, she felt like the only character with any depth and I was satisfied with her character arc. It’s just a shame that I didn’t feel this way about any of the other characters.
Nolan likes to make audiences scratch their heads with his high concept ideas, and this is often a selling point. However, in Tenet, I think the vagueness of the details and the origin story makes this plot a hard one to follow. Unfortunately, this means that the stakes of each scene are not always clear and therefore, naturally, we care less about the outcome. Of course, I expect that when I watch Tenet a second time, and I will soon, that I will take a lot more away from it. But truth be told,I think that compared to Nolan’s other films, Tenet is actually lacking in flavour and although I enjoyed watching it, I don’t feel particularly compelled by it in hindsight.
Overall, I really enjoyed Tenet. Is it Nolan’s best work? Not even close. Is it worth going to watch in cinemas? Absolutely, it’s still a Nolan film after all...
Thanks for reading guys,
Stay safe - Elise x